segunda-feira, 4 de abril de 2011

might be of interest

“The Yellow Wallpaper”:
An Autobiography of Emotions by Charlotte Perkins Gilman
 
by Kelly Gilbert
 
 
Much of the life that is reported of Charlotte Perkins Gilman is concerned with her troubled and loveless relationships: with her mother, her father, and her daughter.  These relationships are central to the life of Charlotte Gilman yet only peripherally relate to the incident in her life that sparked one of the greatest pieces of feminist literature ever written.  Ann L. Jane suggests that "The Yellow Wallpaper" is "the best crafted of her fiction: a genuine literary piece . . . the most directly, obviously, self-consciously autobiographical of all her stories" (Introduction xvi).  Today in the twentieth century this statement does not contain the impact that it should for the women of the world who never experienced the suffocating life that Gilman led from 1860 to 1935.  To be able to relate to Gilman's situation and appreciate  “The Yellow Wallpaper” for how it exemplifies women's lives is difficult in this age where women have more freedom than ever before.  Gilman's original intent in writing the story was to gain personal satisfaction from the knowledge that Dr. S. Weir Mitchell might, after reading the story, change his treatment.  But more importantly Gilman says in her article in The Forerunner "It was not intended to drive people crazy, but to save people from being driven crazy, and it worked" (20).When the story first came out in 1892 the critics saw "The Yellow Wallpaper" as a description of female insanity and mayhem instead of a story that reveals society's values.  A Boston Physician wrote in The Transcript after reading the story that, "Such a story ought not to be written . . . it was enough to drive anyone mad to read it" (Gilman 19).  This statement implies the thought that any woman who would go against the grain of society might as well have been insane for writing it in the first place.  In the time period in which Gilman lived "The ideal woman was not only assigned a social role that locked her into her home, but she was also expected to like it, to be cheerful and gay, smiling and good humored" (Lane, To Herland 109).  The women who refused this role and chose a life of self-expression and freedom from the social constraints suffered ridicule and punishment from their peers.  This is not unlike the repercussions that Gilman experienced throughout her lifetime from expressing her need for independence from the private sphere that she had been relegated to.  Through her creation of "The Yellow Wallpaper," Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote an autobiography of her emotional and psychological feelings of rejection from society as a free-thinking woman. This work is a reaction to the lack of free agency that women had in the late 1800’s and their inability to have a career and a family; the pressures of these restrictions resulted in her involvement in Dr. S. Weir Mitchell’s "rest cure."
Gilman comes from a long list of freedom fighters for women’s rights; without having this type of influence throughout her life she would have never become the free thinker and advocate that she is famous for today.  Charlotte Gilman was born on July 3, 1860, in Hartford, Connecticut to a long lineage of revolutionary thinkers, writers, and intermarriages that were, as Carol Berkin put it, "in discrete confirmation of their pride in association" (18).  Whether from the inbreeding or from the high intellectual capacity of the family, there was a long string of mental disorders fluctuating from “manic-depressive illness” to nervous breakdowns ranging from suicide to short term hospitalizations (Lane, To Herland 110).  Gilman's aunt, Harriet Beecher Stowe, also complained of this same illness;  Beecher wrote to a friend saying, “My mind is exhausted and seems to be sinking into deadness” (Lane, To Herland 111).  She felt this way for years and suffered many breakdowns until finding “real release in her writing" of Uncle Tom's Cabin (Lane, To Herland 111).  Along with Gilman and Stowe, another well known writer and lecturer of her time, Catherine Beecher, was also sent to the same sanitarium for nervous disorders.  Coming from a family of such well known feminists and revolutionaries it's no wonder that Gilman grew up with the knowledge that she had the right to be treated the same as anyone, man or woman, and was just as capable in her work and in her personal life.
Having this strong background affected more than her mind set about things; it also affected her interpersonal relations that she had with her husband and what role she was expected to play in that relationship.  This was a major factor to her breakdown upon entering into the bonds of marriage with Charles Walter Stetson, "an extraordinarily handsome and charming local artist" (Lane, Introduction x).  From the beginning she struggled with the idea of having to conform to the domestic model for women. Upon repeated proposals from Stetson, Gilman tried to "lay bare her torments and reservations" about getting married (Lane, To Herland 85).  She states that "her thoughts, her acts, her whole life would be centered on husband and children. To do the work she needed to do, she must be free" (Lane, To Herland 85).  This idea was scariest of all to Gilman who sincerely loved Charles yet also loved her work and her freedom from constraints.  “After a long period of uncertainty and vacillation” she married Charles at the age of 24 (Lane, Introduction x).  Not even a year later on March 23, 1885, Charlotte bore Katharine Stetson, "But feelings of 'nervous exhaustion' immediately descended upon her, and she became a 'mental wreck' " (Ceplair 17). What is commonly known as Post-Pardum Depression was the affliction that fell upon Gilman; because doctors of the time were not versed about the female hormonal system all nervous disorders were associated with "hysteria" a reference used for women with emotional problems.  In this time of illness she wrote many articles on "women caught between families and careers and the need for women to have work as well as love" (Ceplair 19).
Gilman’s love for free will and her work caused a major tension that was not anticipated; the stress of denying the “normal” social roles of women caused her to have a breakdown that led to the meeting with Dr. S.Weir Mitchell.  Her writing was an effort at expressing the tensions she felt between her work, her husband and her child.  She tried her best at beating the depression she felt but in the end "she collapsed utterly in April 1886" (Ceplair 19).  This final collapse forced her to search out the Dr. Silas Weir Mitchell the nationally recognized neurologist who specialized in the nervous diseases of women.   When Mitchell initially interviewed Gilman he told her that “she was suffering from neurasthenia, or exhaustion of the nerves" the diagnosis required his renowned rest cure (Lane, To Herland 115).  The treatment required for the cure involved four steps: “1) extended and total bed rest; 2) isolation from family and familiar surroundings; 3) overfeeding, especially with cream, on the assumption that increased body volume created new energy; 4) massage and often the use of electricity for 'muscular excitation'" (Lane, To Herland 116).  The women he treated were basically taught an extreme version of how to be domestic and submissive according to the society outside of the sanitarium.  This treatment would be considered cruel and unusual punishment to anyone today but then it was supposed to be the best care you could get.  After a month of treatment Gilman was sent home with the instructions to "live as domestic a life as possible . . . and never touch pen, brush or pencil as long as you live" (Lane, To Herland 121).  For a woman of Gilman’s intellect and stamina this was an impossible feat to accomplish.  She says in her diary that "I went home, followed those directions rigidly for a months and came perilously near to losing my mind" (Lane, To Herland 121).
In the late 1800’s women like Gilman were not given the opportunity to choose their career over their families, to do so meant they had to give up one or the other.  Gilman did exactly that, despite the enormous amount of controversy she created she chose her work over her family.  Due to the enormous pressure of the treatment on her psyche and "calling upon an inner sense of survival, she rejected both husband and physician" (Lane, Introduction x).  Gilman divorced her husband in 1887 and moved to California.   A few years later in order to lecture across the country she gave her child to her ex-husband and his new wife, who happened to be Gilman’s best friend, and left to fulfill her work.  Years later in 1890 she wrote "The Yellow Wallpaper" in reaction to Dr. S. Weir Mitchell’s “rest cure.”  In her "Why I Wrote ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’?" Gilman describes the "years I suffered from a severe and continuous nervous breakdown" and goes on to talk about the doctor who treated her and how in response to treatment had "sent a copy to the physician who so nearly drove me mad" (Gilman 19, 20).  She says, "the best result . . . years later I was told the great specialist had admitted to friends of his that he had altered his treatment of neurasthenia since reading ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’" (Gilman 20).
Gilman is insistent throughout all of her interviews that this acknowledgement of her writing by Dr. Mitchell is the quintessential accomplishment that she could gain.  Regardless of what she said there’s an underlying tone of this work being too close to her emotional and psychological reality to be the true and only reason. There have been many studies as to what Gilman’s intent was in writing "The Yellow Wallpaper" as Joanne Karpinski suggests, "one theme that seems to run through all her works . . . is a desire for order and coherence in lived experience" (3).  Holding this theory true, then it is assumed that this work is a sorting through of her emotions and fears in her personal life and as Lane states, “(it) is an intensely personal examination of Gilman’s private nightmare” (To Herland 127).  If Gilman says that it was for her revenge for Dr. Mitchell she was neglecting to admit that it was also a true to life account of her emotional and psychological state.
Today, after nearly three decades of studies and analysis of both her life and her works, "The Yellow Wallpaper" is one of the few pieces of work that Gilman ever wrote that delved as deep into her emotions and feelings as she was capable of doing.  Lane states that “Never again in her writing did she take such an emotional chance or engage in such introspection as she did in this story” (To Herland 127).  Even though it's fiction the story has some dramatic similarities in Gilman’s own life.  Lane describes a diary entry from Gilman in which she states, "I made a rag baby . . . hung it on the doorknob and played with it. I would crawl into remote closets and under beds-to hide from the grinding pressure of that profound distress" (Lane, To Herland 121).  This is an ironically similar description of the nameless narrator in the story who crawls and "creeps" in the corners of the room.  Gilman showed her emotional reality in the work and tries to discover for herself as Lane describes, "what happens to our lives if we let others run them for us" (Introduction xviii). This realization was hard for her "(it) must have haunted Gilman all her life because it answered the question: what if she had not fled her husband and renounced the most advanced psychiatric advice of her time?" (Introduction xviii).  "The Yellow Wallpaper" is a testament to Gilman's own life experience and in reading it there is a feeling of the tough decisions she made in her life and the impact those decisions had on her emotionally and mentally.  Never again did Gilman write anything with such a personal attachment as this story had, "perhaps the emotional truth and intensity of ‘The Yellow Wallpaper’ drained her; perhaps it frightened her" (Lane, To Herland 127).
Gilman's life was plagued with pain, emotionally and psychologically, yet she lived every second to fullest extent. Her only fear was that she would not accomplish her life's work, and unfortunately because of the lifestyle she lived she never gained recognition for her accomplishments.  Gilman died on August 17, 1935, by huffing chloroform; she had terminal cancer and decided it would be best to take her own life than die a long painful death. It wasn’t until the 1970s that Gilman’s works began to enter into to the colleges and the feminist forum.  She was undoubtedly ahead of her time in her every thought and action.  Not until recently have critics began to study “The Yellow Wallpaper” and the more they delve into the world of Charlotte Perkins Gilman the more we learn about what it was like to live an emotional and psychologically restraining society.
 

Works Cited
Berkin, Ruth Carol. “Self-Images: Childhood and Adolescence.” Critical Essays on Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Ed. Joanne Karpinski. New York: G.K. Hall, 1992.
Ceplair, Larry. “The Early Years.” Charlotte Perkins Gilman: A Non-fiction Reader. Ed. Larry Ceplair. New York: Columbia UP, 1991. 5-19.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. “Why I Wrote 'The Yellow Wallpaper'?” The Forerunner (Oct. 1913): 19-20.
Karpinski, Joanne B. Introduction. Critical Essays on Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Ed. Joanne Karpinski. New York: G.K. Hall, 1992.
Lane, Ann J. Introduction. “The Fictional World of Charlotte Perkins Gilman.” The Charlotte Perkins Gilman Reader. Ed. Ann J. Lane. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980. X-xviii.
---. To Herland and Beyond: The Life and Work of Charlotte Perkins Gilman. New York: Penguin, 1990.

The Changing Role of Womanhood: From True Woman to New Woman in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Deborah Thomas

Worth reading 
The Changing Role of Womanhood:
From True Woman to New Woman in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wallpaper”
 
by Deborah Thomas
 Prior to the twentieth century, men assigned and defined women’s roles.  Although all women were effected by men determining women’s behavior, largely middle class women suffered.  Men perpetrated an ideological prison that subjected and silenced women.  This ideology, called the Cult of True Womanhood, legitimized the victimization of women.  The Cult of Domesticity and the Cult of Purity were the central tenets of the Cult of True Womanhood. Laboring under the seeming benevolence of the Cult of Domesticity, women were imprisoned in the home or private sphere, a servant tending to the needs of the family.  Furthermore, the Cult of Purity obliged women to remain virtuous and pure even in marriage. Religious piety and submission were beliefs that were more peripheral components of the ideology, yet both were borne of and a part of the ideology of True Womanhood. These were the means that men used to insure the passivity and docility of women.  Religion would pacify any desires that could cause a deviation from these set standards, while submission implied a vulnerability and dependence on the patriarchal head (Welter 373-377).
The medical profession’s godlike attitude in “The Yellow Wallpaper” demonstrates this arrogance.  The Rest cure that Dr. Weir Mitchell prescribed, which is mentioned in Gilman’s work, reflects men’s disparaging attitudes.  His Rest cure calls for complete rest, coerced feeding and isolation.  Mitchell, a neurosurgeon specializing in women’s nervous ailments, expounded upon his belief for women’s nervous conditions when he said,
American woman is, to speak plainly, too often physically unfit for her duties as woman, and is perhaps of all civilized females the least qualified to undertake those weightier tasks which tax so heavily the nervous system of man.  She is not fairly up to what nature asks from her as wife and mother. How will she sustain herself under the pressure of those yet more exacting duties which nowadays she is eager to share with the man? (Mitchell 141)
On the other hand, the male sector of society enjoyed mobility.  Men reaped benefits from not only the private domain, but they were also free to leave and enter the public sphere.   They received nurturing from women in the private arena.  The public sphere was where men enjoyed the competition engendered in the market place through which they gained their identity.   In the public sphere, they made decisions that enhanced their own positions in society, while exploiting women’s biological makeup and employing blackmail to render women immobile.  Held captive, women were not to venture out into the public sphere where “they did not belong.” The Cult of True Womanhood “purposely did not acknowledge the growing work force of women, did not sanction professionalism and careerism for women . . .” (Papke 12).Women were cast as emotional servants whose lives were dedicated to the welfare of home and family in the perservence of social stability (Papke 10).  It is against the incredible pressure exerted by men to retain control that women had to agitate.  Women attempted to overthrow the traditional definition of women’s roles.  They subverted the ideology thrust upon them, thereby enabling a redefinition that resulted in a New Womanhood.  Charlotte Perkins Gilman, in the “Yellow Wallpaper,” depicted Gilman’s struggle to throw off the constraints of patriarchal society in order to be able to write.
The yellow wallpaper is symbolic of the Cult of True Womanhood, which binds women to the home and family.  As in the case of Charlotte Gilman, women were constricted to the set parameters that men determined.  Women are conditioned to accept these boundaries and remain in place, in the private sphere. “If anyone, male or female, dared to tamper with the complex virtues which made up True Womanhood, he was dammed immediately as the enemy of God, of civilization, and of the Republic” (Welter 372).   Getting beyond the yellow wallpaper, women defied the corrupted power that men wielded over women, escaped their confinement, and created for themselves a new ideological role, one that included entry into the public sphere, or the market place.
In the face of the prevalence of discrimination and “masculine self-interest” (Roland and Harris 78), Emma Hart Willard “contended that women were entitled to the same dignities and freedoms as men . . .” (Lipman-Blumen 136). As early as 1819, she published a “Plan for Improving Female Education” which would not only enable women to teach their children, but would be a means of enlarging their world beyond the domestic sphere and into the workplace (Lipman-Blumen 136). However, it was the Seneca Falls convention in 1848, with the adoption of the Declaration of Sentiments--fashioned after the Declaration of Independence--that facilitated the eventual redefinition and movement towards New Womanhood.  The work History of Woman Suffrage notes that at such meetings “it is striking how many women doctors are mentioned as either attending the meetings or corresponding with women's rights leaders. . . .  Their stories dramatize . . .  the prejudice that they faced . . .” in their struggles to remove the shackles of their jailers (Giele 48).
Women such as those Charlotte Gilman portrayed in her work forged ahead and challenged patriarchal ideologies. Women could move beyond the constrictions of the ideology, the Cult of True Womanhood. The existence of the institution of marriage, in which men played the dominant role and wielded control, placed women at the mercy of their male counterparts. The Cult of True Womanhood allowed the perpetrators to be the beneficiaries while calling for women’s complicity in the denigration of self. Such women made the emergence from the private sphere a reality, despite the seeming impediment of feminine biology. As a result, the romanticizing of woman’s role in the family and home segregated women, barring them from the public domain became a thing of the past.  Freed from the enslavement of the ideology associated with the institution of marriage, women seized the right to self-assertion.  Reacting to oppression women revolted against the implementation of feminine gender roles.  Womanhood could no longer be interpreted by the Cult of True Womanhood.  Instead, it now expounded the self-establishment of the expansion of women into the public realm and the birth of a New Womanhood.

Notes to the text The Yellow Wall Paper -check http://itech.fgcu.edu/faculty/wohlpart/alra/gilman.htm#Myself

from:http://itech.fgcu.edu/faculty/wohlpart/alra/gilman.htm#Myself
Myself:  (1.) “In introducing ‘myself’ and ‘John,’ the narrator intensifies her  awkward positioning in her sentence and society; she is not even on par with ‘ordinary people like John'”  (Golden 195).
  
Colonial mansion, a hereditary estate:   John S. Bak explains that the mansion incorporates “external instruments of restraint suggestive of a prison or a mental ward” (41).

One:  (1.) Gilman uses this noun to describe how the narrator “disguises her autonomy” and “conveys the narrator’s helplessness and perceived inability to change her uncomfortable situation; the repetition of ‘one’ creates a haunting echo of anonymity throughout this entry and the entire story” (Golden 195).  It demonstrates “a sense of conventional acquiescence . . . ” (King 28).
 Sickness:  (1.) The state represents “the breaking free, even if  only in the hallucination of madness . . . ”  If it is the “result of her alienation from the role society expects her to play, then her insistence that she is ill is an evasion of that reality”; “In the abject helplessness of her insanity lies the means of power by which her repressed shadow can gain a form of victory” (King 25, 27, 31)  (2.) This insanity “’madness,’  [is] a potent metaphor for feminine anger” (Knight 290)
Physicians:  (1.) The narrator’s husband and brother represent, “The power that men possess over women…to prescribe what they may or may not do [and] . . . to diagnose -- to name what is sickness and health, abnormal and normal” (King 27). 
 Yellow:  (1.) According to Lanser, the color in Gilman’s cultural era “applied not only to the Chinese, Japanese, and the light-skinned African-Americans but also to Jews, Poles, Hungarians, Italians, and even the Irish” and symbolized “inferiority, strangeness, cowardice, ugliness, and backwardness”  (426, 427).
Writing: (1.) The undated journal entries “can be seen as a spatial indication of the narrator’s own fragmented sense of self” (Golden 193).  (2.) Golden suggests that the writing is not “a place for self-expression or a safe domain” for the narrator’s newly emerging sense of self (Golden 194).  (3.) The narrator is allowed “an artistic sensibility, one that evidently begins to resurface the moment that John locks her away . . . ”; but “Instead of being freed by this aesthetic and potentially liberating confrontation, however, she is defeated, destroyed, and driven to madness . . . ” (Hume 479, 480). (4.) It is also “her only opportunity to use her own discourse” (King 27).  (5.) Susan S. Lanser states it “constitutes a kind of sanity in the face of the insanity of male dominance” (418).  (6.)   The narrator “not only reveals her unconscious awareness of her fictive design, but also leads her readers toward an understanding both of the terror and dark  amusement she feels as she confronts herself-a prisoner inside the yellow wall-paper an unsavory social text created and sustained not only by men like John, but by women like Jennie, and, most horribly, herself” (Hume 480). 
  
Mary:  (1.) The nanny represents “the spiritual and maternal perfection which the narrator so conspicuously lacks.  The narrator . . . fits nowhere . . . and is appropriately nameless”  (Johnson 526). 

Wall-paper:  (1.) To the narrator it represents “her ‘repressed other’ or ‘suppressed self’” (Hume 481).  (2.) It also “comes to stand (in) for whatever it is that produces the queer affect: ‘It is stripped - off the paper - in great patches . . .’ ” (Crewe 283).  (3.) It is “the desire which haunts her socially conforming self: the desire for an uncanny, forbidden self, unreadable, lawless and mocking”;  the paper she writes on is “’dead paper’ . . . forbidden paper . . . She creates it and it creates her” (King 29, 31). 
Jennie:  (1.) She represents the “husband’s sibling-surrogate,  other woman, sister-in-law,  nursing-sister, keeper . . . [and is] viewed  by  the narrator as a conjugal collaborator,  enforcer, and rival claimant upon the wallpaper . . . ”  (Crewe 280). 
John: (1.) Hume views the narrator’s husband as “mechanistic, rigid, predictable, and sexist” (478).  
 I: (1.) Gilman’s use and placement of this pronoun “demonstrate a positive change in self-presentation precisely at the point when her actions dramatically compromise her sanity and condemn her to madness” and the word “becomes not an act of assertion but rather of acquiescence determined by John’s authority” (Golden 193, 195).  The noun “convey[s] an emerging sense of self and conviction . . . [and] a stronger albeit fictionalized self”; it “connotes power . . . a reversal of the dynamics of power between the narrator and John”  (Golden 196).  (2.) It expresses the “flighty or rebellious thoughts . . .” (Crewe 275).  (3.) The pronoun expresses the narrator’s inability to conform to social approval and male protection-- “patriarchal ideology.”  Gilman utilizes the word to  state the narrator’s unacceptable opinions in “active defiance” (King 28).
Moonlight:  (1.) The narrator “comes to life at night . . . [it’s the] nocturnal world of the unconscious . . . empowering imagination” (Johnson 525). 
Pattern:  (1.) When compared to gymnastics, it “presents her interests as a game . . .” and expresses a “contrast between the rigidly mannered and socially acceptable behavior of her husband (and less empathically, of Jennie) and her increasing dissatisfaction with such behavior” (Hume 480). 
Daylight:  (1.) It depicts “masculine order and domestic routine”  and “rigidly hierarchical and imaginatively sterile daylight world . . . ”;  and a “conscious struggle . . . from idle fancy . . . ”  (Johnson 523, 525).
Yellow Smell:  (1.) The narrator withstands the strong “synaesthetic disorientation” because it adds to her fear and “the more confused she becomes . . . the clearer her vision of an emerging ‘subtext,’ in which her imprisoned double is frantically shaking the bars of her prison” (Johnson 529).
Tearing the paper:  (1.) In this act, the narrator “assists the double to break free from the forms that  confine her”; yet this act can also be viewed as “not intended . . . to free her from male repression, as has been suggested, but to eliminate the rebellious self which is preventing her from achieving her ego-ideal”; a “destruction of the other self” (King 25, 30, 31).
“I kept on creeping”:  (1.) Beverly A. Hume describes the ironic transformation in the narrator’s husband as “by ‘fainting,’ altering his conventional role as a soothing, masculine figure to that of a stereotypically weak nineteenth-century female” (478).  (2.) The “male mastery is tipped over into nightmare parody, as total abdication of power transforms itself into another form of power” (King 31).
Jane:  (1.) When the narrator uses her name in the third person, she depicts “the conflict between the heroine’s two selves . . .” (King 29).   (2.) Gilman’s use of this word “shows subconscious signs of resentment towards her roles of wife and mother” (Knight 290).

The Yellow Wall-Paper” (1892), by Charlotte Perkins Gilman (1860 – 1935)

nElaine Hedges introduced the text in the canon in 1973, rescuing it from literary obscurity .
Gilman was an advocate of social motherhood.
nshe had little formal education
nActivism on behalf of women; yet conservative in her racial views.
A descent into madness, and one helped by family and doctors. 

segunda-feira, 21 de março de 2011

extracts form A modest proposal - Jonathan Swift

Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) – satirist;  Gulliver's Travels (1726) and A Modest Proposal (1729).
It is a melancholy object to those who walk through this great town or travel in the country, when they see the streets, the roads, and cabin doors, crowded with beggars of the female sex, followed by three, four, or six children, all in rags and importuning every passenger for an alms. These mothers, instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg sustenance for their helpless infants: who as they grow up either turn thieves for want of work, or leave their dear native country to fight for the Pretender in Spain, or sell themselves to the Barbadoes.
I think it is agreed by all parties that this prodigious number of children in the arms, or on the backs, or at the heels of their mothers, and frequently of their fathers, is in the present deplorable state of the kingdom a very great additional grievance; and, therefore, whoever could find out a fair, cheap, and easy method of making these children sound, useful members of the commonwealth, would deserve so well of the public as to have his statue set up for a preserver of the nation. The number of souls in this kingdom being usually reckoned one million and a half.
I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection. I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout.
I do therefore humbly offer it to public consideration that of the hundred and twenty thousand children already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one-fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle or swine; and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in the sale to the persons of quality and fortune through the kingdom; always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump and fat for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends; and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.
I grant this food will be somewhat dear, and therefore very proper for landlords, who, as they have already devoured most of the parents, seem to have the best title to the children.Those who are more thrifty  may flay the carcass; the skin of which artificially dressed will make admirable gloves for ladies, and summer boots for fine gentlemen.
Some persons of a desponding spirit are in great concern about that vast number of poor people, who are aged, diseased, or maimed. (…) It is very well known that they are every day dying and rotting by cold and famine, and filth and vermin, as fast as can be reasonably expected. And as to the young laborers, they are now in as hopeful a condition; they cannot get work, and consequently pine away for want of nourishment, to a degree that if at any time they are accidentally hired to common labor, they have not strength to perform it; and thus the country and themselves are happily delivered from the evils to come.
Supposing that one thousand families in this city, would be constant customers for infants flesh, besides others who might have it at merry meetings, particularly at weddings and christenings, I compute that Dublin would take off annually about twenty thousand carcasses.
I can think of no one objection, that will possibly be raised against this proposal. (…) I profess, in the sincerity of my heart, that I have not the least personal interest in endeavoring to promote this necessary work, having no other motive than the public good of my country, by advancing our trade, providing for infants, relieving the poor, and giving some pleasure to the rich. I have no children by which I can propose to get a single penny; the youngest being nine years old, and my wife past child-bearing.

tentative syllabus for Wednesdays and Fridays- depends on how discussion goes - whether we move faster or a bit slower....

Tentative syllabus
QUARTA 7:30-9:30
SEXTA
MARÇO


2 Apresentação da disciplina e distribuição de tarefas para recesso (1)
 Recesso carnaval tarefa de leitura Angela´s Ashes + áudio book
    Recesso carnaval –Angela´s Ashes
11 Recesso carnaval Angela´s Ashes
16  Angela´s Ashes + film extract
18  Angela´s Ashes+ Attribute seminars
23 Angela´s Ashes + film extract
25 Exam Angela´s Ashes
30 Edgar Allan Poe´s “The Tell Tale Heart”
1 Poe /  Charlotte Perkins Gilmam – biography, work and analysis of The Yellow WallPaper
ABRIL

6   Charlotte Perkins Gilmam – The Yellow WallPaper
8   The Yellow WallPaper/ Sherwood Anderson: “Death in the woods”
13 Sherwood Anderson: “Death in the woods”
15 D. H. Lawrence: “The Rocking-horse winner
20 D. H. Lawrence: “The Rocking-horse winner”
22 Sexta-feira Santa
27 Katherine Mansfield (1888-1923): “The Doll’s House” (1922)
29 Katherine Mansfield/ Fitzgerald
MAIO

4 F. Scott Fitzgerald (1894-1940): “Babylon Revisited”(1931
6 Fitzgerald/  William Faulkner (1897-1962): “A Rose for Emily” (1930)
11 William Faulkner: “A Rose for Emily”
13 Flannery O’Connor (1925-1964) - “Good Country People
18 Flannery O’Connor (1925-1964) - “Good Country People
20  Oral test on short- stories
25 Semana de Letras
27 Semana de Letras
JUNHO

1  Seminar on Woolf´s  Mrs Dalloway
3 Woolf´s  Mrs Dalloway film extract
8  The Hours
10  The Hours film extract
15 The Hours
17 The Hours
22 The Hours
23  Exam on Mrs Dalloway and The Hours
27/06 a 02/07 estudos para exames finais
JULHO 04 Exames finais



Grades = prova sobre Angela´s Ashes  + seminário + oral test on short stories + prova sobre The Hours and Mrs Dalloway (peso 2)

The Hours
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=RNCG65K6
o http://www.megaupload.com/?d=7DPE5YZE
Angela's Ashes:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=G2RIFA6C 

tudents UFPR test next Friday 25. The seminars will start the wekk after, on the 28 March, with Edgar Allan Poe. Friday TEST: multiple choice to test about the plot of Angela´s ashes and a choice of essay about themes in the book.

Tentative syllabus rearranged

SEGUNDA 20:30-22:30
SEXTA 18:30- 20:30
FEVEREIRO e MARÇO


28 Apresentação da disciplina e distribuição de tarefas para recesso (1)
4 Recesso carnaval tarefa de leitura Angela´s Ashes + áudio book
7    Recesso carnaval –Angela´s Ashes
11 Recesso carnaval Angela´s Ashes
14  Angela´s Ashes + film extract
18  Angela´s Ashes+ Attribute seminars
21 Angela´s Ashes + film extract
25 Exam on Angela´s Ashes
28 Edgar Allan Poe´s “The Tell Tale Heart”

ABRIL
1 Poe + Charlotte Perkins Gilmam – biography, work and analysis of The Yellow WallPaper
4 Charlotte Perkins Gilmam – biography, work and analysis of The Yellow WallPaper
8  Sherwood Anderson: “Death in the woods
11 D. H. Lawrence: “The Rocking-horse winner (film)
15 D. H. Lawrence: “The Rocking-horse winner
18 Katherine Mansfield (1888-1923): “The Doll’s House” (1922)
22 Sexta-feira Santa
25 F. Scott Fitzgerald (1894-1940): “Babylon Revisited”(1931
29 Fitzgerald: “Babylon Revisited”
MAIO

2 William Faulkner: “A Rose for Emily”
6 “A Rose for Emily” (1930)
9 Flannery O’Connor (1925-1964) - “Good Country People
13 Flannery O’Connor (1925-1964) - “Good Country People
16 Flannery O’Connor (1925-1964) - “Good Country People - Oral Test
20  Oral test on short- stories- Mrs Dalloway Film
23 Semana de letras
27 Semana de letras
30  Seminar on Woolf´s  Mrs Dalloway

JUNHO
3 Woolf´s  Mrs Dalloway film extract
6  The Hours
10  The Hours film extract
13 The Hours
17 The Hours
20  The Hours
23  Exam on Mrs Dalloway and The Hours
27/06 a 02/07 estudos para exames finais
JULHO 04 Exames finais